A Critical Analysis Of Techno Change Information Technology Essay

A Critical Analysis Of Techno Change In spend a pennyation engine room EssayThis report scoreers a deciding(prenominal) analysis of the article A Techno- ethnic Emergence Perspective on the solicitude of Techno-change written by Stephen Jackson and George Philip.The leading purpose of this analysis is to identify and criticise the original contri onlyion of the authors in the acquire, to disc all over any deficiencies in the proposed perspective, to propose any improvements and to look for any forthcoming interrogation in this field. A brief overview is provided at the initiatory. Part II, III and IV outline the definition of techno-change, importance of techno-change and techno-cultural upshot perspective. This is followed by the comment on originality and contributions adopted research method, its appropriateness and limitations and theoretical argument made by the study in Part V, VI and VII respectively. Key findings and their implications are provided in Part VIII. Fi nally, Part IX and X provide the deficiencies of the study and some recomm extirpateations for future research in this field.I. ABOUT THE ARTICLEThe article in press, A techno-cultural perspective on the precaution of techno-change, published in the International Journal of Information Management in 2010 by Stephen Jackson and George Philip, explores the function of husbandry in the prudence of techno-change or technological change applying ethnic Theory originated from Anthropology as a hypothetical lens. The current triple foremost viewpoints on organisation culture in relation to the management of technological changes namely technological determinism, cultural determinism and techno-cultural emergence, drive home been examined in this paper. The innermost precept of this article as proposed by the authors is that setoff ii of the troika approaches the technological determinism which pays slight importance on the organisational culture and cultural determinism which p rovides few thoughts on the technology would non be appropriately well-situated in the technological change management arena rather the authors put emphasis on the techno-cultural emergence approach in the facilitating contours of hierarchism, individualism/market and equalitarianism that promotes an atmosphere which can effectively manage the technological changes.II. WHAT IS TECHNO-CHANGE?The phrase Techno-change relates to the organisational changes for technological drives and encompasses a wide variety of features that are connected to and invite effects for the changes contained by the organisations (Harison and Boonstra, 2009). When organisations adopt pristine technology which usually prompts or necessitates focal organizational changes, we can call it as Techno-change or technological change (Nilsson, 2008). The term Techno-change was first conceived by Markus in Technochange Management Using IT to drive organisational change in 2004 (Markus, 2004) and from then the ter m techno-change has been widely applied in the technological and fuddle management field along with various organisational circumstances.TECHNOLOGICAL DETERMINISM Technological determinism theory presumes that technological changes will drive cultural changes and social structure as well (Chandler, 2000). match to Chandler (2000), technological determinists usually try to account for nearly the whole thing in relation to technology a perception is termed as technocentrism.CULTURAL DETERMINISM Cultural determinism theory assumes that only culture determines our emotional and behavioural level. The supporters of cultural determinism view that culture is restricted, permanent, unitary and immobile over time (Jackson and Philip, 2005).III. importance OF TECHNO-CHANGENow-a-days, techno-change is a critical incident and it is getting highly equal attention from some(prenominal) the profit and non-profit organisations (Harison and Boonstra, 2009). As innovations flip been deluging in all aspects of businesses for the last couple of decades, the increasing world and slaying of large-scale information systems like the Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP), Customer Relationship Management (CRM) or Supply Chain Management (SCM) systems in business firms as well as higher education providing institutions have become a common phenomena (Chae and Lanzara, 2006 Harison and Boonstra, 2009).Although these wide spread applications of techno-changes, industry data ravish that techno-change has high propensity to failure (Chae and Lanzara, 2006).A recent study by the Computer Associates (CA) in 2007 in the UK and Ireland reveals cheap visibleness about the importance of IT projects and less management control over the project are compriseing more than 256 million in the UK each year and one third of all the projects run-over of their veritable budget by 10% 20% (CA, 2007).The KPMG (2005) survey of 600 organisations in twenty-two countries show approximately 50% of the p articipants experience at least one project failure in 2004 whereas KPMGs 2003 survey reveals 57% of the respondents had one or more IT projects failure in 2002 (KMGP, 2005)The Robbins-Gioia Survey in 2001 correspondently states that 51% ERP implementations are hitless (Basu, 2001). fit in to IT Cortex (available online http//www.it-cortex.com/Stat_Failure_Rate.htm), the Conference Board Survey in 2001 withal does non show happy progenys as only 34% ERP implementations are self-made, 58% are moderate successful and 8% implementations are totally unsuccessful. The Chaos Report (1995) conducted by the Standish multitude shows 31.1% IT projects are cancelled prior to their completion and 52.7% projects over run their original costs by 189%. The money spent on these collapses and overruns simply could be the apex of well-kn profess iceberg. The gone opportunity cost could not be quantifiable but believed to be more than trillions of dollars in the USA only. According to the rep ort, more than $250 billion are spent in the USA all year on nearly 175,000 IT based projects.The above surveys outcomes substantiate that neglecting techno-change can cost considerable amount of money in terms of wastage and business failure.IV. IMPORTANCE OF TECHNO-CULTURAL EMERGENCE PERSPECTIVEThe authors have proposed to employ and create a newfound perspective the techno-cultural emergence perspective to manage the techno-change. What are the logic and influences behind this new perspective?According to Yates (2006), this emergent change is unanticipated and could be viewed as an opportunity rather than merely a hazard against the project. Equipped with resources, the actors could underpin and/or make way for the emergent change. The advantages and importance of this perspective is that it recognizes the unavoidability of unforeseen emergent and improvisation and admits those as possible optimistic events rather than a downbeat. As the authority of that project cannot alway s manage the change over the technology as is planned, they could employ resources to get benefit of the emergent outgrowth.The techno-cultural emergence perspective also critically examines the intricate connections among social, technical and interpretative issues that continuously put pressure on organisational contexts (Jackson and Philip, 2005). In their earlier paper which was published in 2005, these two authors argued that the techno-cultural emergence perspective incorporates human, social, political factors and the processes of techno-change that are unheeded by the other two perspectives.V. ORIGINIALITY AND CONTRIBUTIONSHereby the critique report has made an attempt to evaluate the originality of the study by comparing other researchers contributions and studies. From the study it is quite apparent that the authors have followed the central theme of Cultural Theory proposed by Douglas (1970). Lots of studies and researches have been conducted in both technological deter minism and cultural determinism and it seems none of the approaches are quite successful in the management of techno-change. The third approach, the techno-cultural emergence, which incorporates both the technology and organisations culture, works in both ways, focuses on the emergency and approaches in the incremental line for the change, has got very little attention and understanding from the researchers. The authors made an attempt to solve this problem incorporating Cultural Theorys three cosmologies change forms (hierarchism, egalitarianism and individualism/market) in the techno-cultural emergence perspective. As organisations culture is complex, ambiguous and authoritative in nature (Heilpern and Nadler, 1992), it has become difficult to implement techno-change easily and the authors have argued that enabling forms of hierarchism (fosters visionary leadership and coordination), egalitarianism (fosters teamwork, mutual confidence and information sharing) and individualism/ma rket (fosters imagination, motivation and novelty) will be successful in the techno-change management. The authors have made significant novel contribution by proposing the enabling forms of Cultural Theorys three mechanisms for the effective management of techno-change.Other researchers also take note about these three enabling forms of Cultural Theory for intranet, development of culture and inter-firm relations but none of them have proposed for the total management of techno-change by these three enabling forms.For example, Ruppel and Harrington (2001) mention that flexibility and novelty (individualism/market) faith and interest for colleagues (egalitarianism) and strategies and k immediatelyledge management (hierarchism) will optimize intranet implementation (techno-change).Hendriks (1999) argues the elimination of fatalism for the development of culture in the organisations.Adler (2001) also shows three enabling mechanisms of Cultural Theory market/ footing, hierarchy/autho rity, and community/trust will improve inter-organisations relationship.VI. RESEARCH METHOD, APPROPRIATENESS AND LIMITATIONSThe authors have implemented Case direct and Multiple Methods, a part of Qualitative research method, for proposing the techno-change management by techno-cultural emergence perspective in the facilitating modes of hierarchism, egalitarianism and individualism/market.According to Yin (1994, p 20), a caseful study research should have the following components Development of research head words Development of propositions, if any Analysis The rationale connecting the data to the propositions The decisive factors for interpreting the findings.The briny research question was how does Cultural Theory offer a novel insight for better consideration of techno-change and its successful management? Beside this, the authors raised another question which perspective(s)/cosmology(ies) would be suitable for proper management of techno-change.The authors developed a four th proposition.The authors collected coded, constructed theories and conducted analysis through the use of multiple methods and packet package (Hyper explore2.6).As technological determinism (Case study A) and cultural determinism (Case study B) did not achieve the expected changes were unsuccessful in context of change outcomes did not respond to the unanticipated improvisations to the technology and did not address properly to the unanticipated cultural issues arose from the techno-changes as opposed to the techno-cultural determinism (Case study C), the authors built their rationale for the fourth proposition on the basis of these comparisons.The decisive factors were enabling forms of Cultural Theory, namely hierarchism, egalitarianism, and individual/market as proposed by Douglas (1970) for successful management of techno-change.Stake (1995) and Yin (1994) recognized six bases for substantiation in the case study research method as illustrated in Tellis (1997) and these area. Documents (internal documents were analysed)b. Archival records (company literature were analysed)c. Interviews (total 46 interviews were conducted)d. Direct inspection (Golds 1969 method was applied)e. Users inspection (Golds 1969 method was followed)f. physiological artefacts (company blueprints were analysed)The above discussion confirms the appropriateness of Case Study research method for this study. Overall, this fictional character of research method has proved well-matched with the proposal as it provides the end to end analysis of the problem discussed and other researchers like Myers (1997) also supported case study research method in the IS field.However, there could be some limitations also recognised in this study. It seems the authors have applied Grounded Theory (Myers, 1997) which examined the initial evolution of cultural issues in the three assorted cases. A stage approach applying longitudinal or ethnographic method could be more useful in this type of researc h as both the methods examine the events and proceedings at every stage of techno-change life-cycle. As the project implementation periods were very lengthy in all the three cases, biasness of the participants could be a limitation in this study, which provided difficulties for the interviewees to recall the experiences end-to-end the project implementation period. Other researchers such(prenominal) as Orlikowski (1991) and Preston (1991) also support the use of ethnographic method in the IS field as illustrated in Myers (1997).VII. supposititious ARGUMENTThe authors proposed a techno-cultural emergence perspective to understand techno-change management, moving away from technological and cultural deterministic views of change, through the enabling forms of Cultural Theory proposed by Douglas (1970). According to Cultural Theory, individuals social situation can be identified by two principal dimensions grid and group, ultimately produce four delegacy of life (cosmology). The co smologies are fatalism, hierarchism, individualism/market and egalitarianism. Each way of life possesses facilitating/enabling and or constraining/impeding characteristics. Fatalism produces apathy and fear, thus, it is regarded as constraining form in the techno-change management. The enabling form of hierarchism inspires leadership and coordination individualism/market inspires creativity, motivation and inventiveness and egalitarianism inspires teamwork, confidence and information sharing. The authors in this study make a theoretical argument that because of technological determinisms negligence in organisational culture and cultural determinisms negligence in technology, these three cosmologies enabling forms will lead to successful management of techno-change. The authors claim that change should be viewed as continuous and emergent rather than planned and managers should take their endeavour to lessen constraining cultural attributes and construct such environment that will p romote the enabling forms and as a result techno-change management can be do successfully. No research substantiation for this claim is clearly apparent in the study.VIII. THE KEY FINDINGS AND THEIR IMPLICATIONSSeveral important findings can be obtained from this study. A new perspective Management should not follow top-down technological or cultural driven method for the successful implementation and management of techno-change. As an alternative, the authors proposed an incremental/evolutionary style along with continuous adjustments and improvements in culture and technology will lead successful techno-change management. Stakeholders in techno-change should keep in mind that change is an ongoing process and it is made up of uncertain, enigmatical and unavoidable issues of both the technology and culture.In terms of implications, this new strategy might be quite successful as both the technological and cultural determinism approaches have proved unsuccessful in the techno-change . This strategy might get higher success rate in the successful implementation of ERP which aims to get visibility on inventories around the world or placing one face to the customer (Markus, 2004, p 14), on BPR (Business Process Redesign) or on various innovative and modern measurements and amendments in organisation structures. This strategy might be implemented in Supply Chain Management (SCM) as well which aims to address on the incompatible productions and deliveries schedules, greater information sharing within the associated organisations and the ways of procurements. More attention on techno-change process Much concentration is needed in the field of software vendor and contract training and encouragement of participation of the users data transfer interface development, system testing and coverage.In terms of implications, addressing these issues during the techno-change management process is vital. According to Markus (2004), although the management might know the need of a new system but might not be aware of huge variations betwixt systems of the similar type recommended by various software vendors as well as the amount of flexibility around the softwares applications. She argues this superior awareness of the options will lead to successful techno-change. Sometimes, the management might decide to save money on software testing which can result buggy software, or on training of users which could result incompetent users who commit higher mistakes. Cultural issues Organisations cultural issues must not be overlooked during the techno-change process. Constricting cultural cosmology must be minimised whereas facilitating cosmologies must be promoted within the organisations culture.Markus (2004) argues that every techno-change brings out probable provocation from human reaction which we term as resistance to change and any difference between the techno-change and organisations culture brings out conflict and chips in to resistance. She claims, be cause of their view to the devotion to the patients care, doctors and nurses usually resent those techno-changes which bring greater organizational competences. Individuals who like to work on their own might resent to the techno-changes which provide greater teamwork facilities. Markus (2004) also illustrates two national cultural misfits in the techno-change as well because of lacking in map culture, geographical information system (GIS) is not greatly used in India whereas ERP system is rarely used in China because managers have little confidence in their subordinates regarding the access in the business data. So managers should promote coordination among users (hierarchism) teamwork and confidence among users (egalitarianism) and inventiveness, motivation and creativity (individualism/market) whereas managers should try to minimise any apathy and fear to techno-change (fatalism).IX. DEFECIENCIES IN THE bring1. The authors proposed perspective is totally based on Douglass (197 0) Cultural Theory which is not away from criticisms as well. According to Caulkins (1999), the first drawback is the outline of this theory has not been done through comprehensive cross-cultural testing. He also proposed for further testing of this group-grid framework.2. From the study, it appears techno-change and IT projects are the same although there is substantial difference in between these two processes. According to Markus (2004) IT projects aim to improve technical performances whereas techno-change heavily affects the users such as people, process and organisation performance. She also argues that although both IT projects and techno-changes heavily rely on IT but IT projects bring organisations success through improved functionality, reliability and cost of technology with no considerable amendments in the organisations operations whereas techno-changes generally improve organisations outcome measurements easily like the process efficiency and cycle time. The authors d id not distinguish techno-changes and IT projects in the study.3. There is no cross-case analysis for the same private sector enterprises. For example, the authors could select a retail business to compare with the business/technology solution provider. A further cross-case analysis could be done for public sector by including and analysing a health care service provider and a government organisation.4. Case study research method is a multi-perspective analysis method (Tellis, 1997) which means the study does not count just the voice and perspectives of the actors but also needs to consider various relevant groups of actors and the relations among them. The cases in this study only considered actors within the organisations but ignored the external stake-holders and users like the students, customers and investors.5. The proposition is not tested on different sectors like the NGOs and not-for-profit organisations.6. The proposition is not tested on different countries culture as wel l. We cant get any idea in which country/location this study was conducted. Different countries have different cultures and cultures vary for the locations as well, the disclosure of location/country of the study would provide some idea about the perception and successful management of techno-change in the same geographic location.7. lean information can lead inappropriate implications. For example, we can find none of the cases in this study reveal the actual cost or the total cost of the techno-change. As cost is a major consideration for implementing IS project or techno-change, the information on cost for the organisations could provide insight for other similar types of organisations.8. Social, sparing and environmental factors have not been analysed in the cases. None of the cases shows the social advantages, benefits or disadvantages of the employees/users for a techno-change. Economic benefits of the organisations have not been discussed. Every techno-change has impacts on its surrounding environment and that has not been mentioned anywhere in the study. A classic example was illustrated by Markus (2004) for Cigna. The firm launched its new CRM for the cost of $1 billion which ultimately laid off its customer service personnel department but the new system at the end could not handle 3.5 million customers complaints and eventually Cignas share price fell significantly.9. The authors have not outlined how to implement emergence perspective throughout the organisations and the factors are needed to be considered while implementing it. The authors also have not mentioned how the organisations can create, support, maintain and promote the enabling forms and how organisations can avoid and discourage the constraining form.11. The authors have not critically analysed the role of IT specialists and other internal rung specialists like the industrial engineering and strategic planners as they play vital roles in the implementation of techno-change (Markus, 2004). Besides the performances of organisational managers, internal and external change consultants and technology performances have not critically analysed in the study. The techno-change life cycle chartering, the IT project, start-up and shakedown (Markus, 2004) of the described three cases has not been properly stated as well.12. According to the authors, an individuals membership in the cosmologies is not fixed or permanent and it is dynamic in nature. Our concern is possessing three cosmologies at the same time for an individual cannot it create confusion, conflict and cooccur situations in the individuals which might impede the process of techno-change?X. RECOMMENDATIONSAction Research could be applied instead of Case Study research method as it is now attracting more attention for researchers (Myers, 1997). Although action research is generally ignored in information systems aside from some notable experiments, for example, Checkland (1991) as illustrated in Myers (1997 ).Ethnographic research could be applied as it puts emphasis on social and cultural context. As ethnographic research encompasses a greater area including the study of the development of IS to the study features of IT management, multiple perspectives can be incorporated and has widely been used in the study of information systems (Myers, 1997), this type of research would be more high-fidelity for the investigation and management of techno-change.Cross-case analysis can be applied. This type of technique examines pairs of cases, categorizes resemblances and dissimilarities in each pair which will lead to a certain type of pattern which may provide specific support or evidence in the case studies (Tellis, 1997). Although this study compared only one pair of public enterprises, it ignored other cross-case analysis in the private sector.Time and distance effects should be reduced as both of them affect the techno-change management (Markus, 2004). If we look at the Case B where TI/IS implementation time was 5 years (2001 2006) whereas Case A and C both took 2 years. This long period of implementation time could affect the users and members of IT/IS adversely where they may feel distant from the organisations and the ongoing operations of the organisations which might put question on the success of the techno-change.XI. REFERENCESAdler, P. S., 2001, Market, Hierarchy, and Trust The cognition Economy and the Future of Capitalism, Organization Science, majority 12, No. 2, Available online http//orgsci.journal.informs.org/cgi/content/abstract/12/2/215Basu, I., 2001, ERP implementation failures and the Philosophers Stone, Available online http//www.expresscomputeronline.com/20071105/management04.shtmlCaulkins, D., 1999, Is Mary Douglass Grid/Group Analysis Useful for Cross-Cultural Research? Cross-Cultural Research, Volume 33, No. 1, pp 108-128, Available online http//ccr.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/33/1/108Chae, B. and Lanzara, G. F., 2006, Self-destructive d ynamics in large-scale techno-change and some ways of counteracting it, Information Technology People, Volume 19, No. 1, pp 74 97. Available online www.emeraldinsight.com/0959-3848.htmChandler, D., 2000, Technological or Media Determinism, Available online http//www.aber.ac.uk/media/Documents/tecdet/tdet03.htmlHarison, E. and Boonstra, A., 2009, Essential competencies for technochange management Towards an estimate model, International Journal of Information Management, Volume 29, Issue 4, pp 283 294, Available online http//www.sciencedirect.com/scienceHeilpern, J. And Nadler, D., 1992, Implementing TQM A Process of Cultural Change, Organisational Architecture, San Francisco Jossey-Bass.Hendriks, F, 1999, The Post-industrializing City Political Perspectives and Cultural Biases, GeoJournal, Volume 47, lean 3, Available online http//www.springerlink.com/content/pmtatt1umn2cej8t/Jackson, S. and Philip, G., 2005, Organisational Culture and the Management of Technological Change A T heoretical Perspective, Available online http//is2.lse.ac.uk/asp/aspecis/20050109.pdfKPMG, 2005, Information Risk Management, Global IT Project Management Survey How committed are you? Available online http//us.kpmg.com/Rutus_Prod/Documents/12/ITProjectAdvisorySurveyReport.pdfMarkus, M. L., 2004, Technochange management using IT to drive organizational change, Journal of Information Technology, Volume 19, pp 4 20, JIT Palgrave Macmillan Ltd.Myers, M., 1997, Qualitative Research in Information Systems, Available online CDocuments and SettingsuserDesktopQualitative Research in Information Systems.htmNilsson, A., 2008, Management of Technochange in an Interorganizational e-Government Project, Proceedings of the 41st Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Available online http//www.computer.org/portal/web/csdl/doi/10.1109/HICSS.2008.240Ruppel, C.P. and Harrington, S. J., 2001, Sharing Knowledge Through Intranets A Study of Organisational Culture and Intranet Implementation , IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, Volume 44, Issue 1, pp 37 52Tellis, W., 1997, Introduction to Case Study, Available online http//www.nova.edu/ssss/QR/QR3-2/tellis1.htmlThe Standish Group Report Chaos, 1995, Available online http//www.projectsmart.co.uk/docs/chaos-report.pdfThe CA, 2007, Press Releases, Available online http//www.ca.com/gb/press/release.aspx?cid=155480Yates, J., 2006, Planned, Emergent and expedient Change, Available online http//icd.si.umich.edu/cknobel/?q=node/41Yin, R., 1994, Case Study Research Design and Methods, Second Edition, Beverly Hills, California, Sage Publication.